deezynar (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

@onthecuttingedge2005 What is a wave guide?

deezynar (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

@SuperCaviTationIstic Why do you think the collector coil doesn't fill the entire focus area?

humexavier (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

Can you use other light sources on solar panels and get same energy like wrapping panels with El wire or electroluminescent glow wire or fiber optic glow wire and get more energy than you put into it?

77GSlinger (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

Thanks I see I have been slammed by those who worship academic fraud. Nice to see others are aware of this: energy baron, central banker, corporate owned racket as well!

SuperCaviTationIstic (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

Agreed....Schauberger and Tesla are where it's at....They should have at least made the collector surface larger to pick up the entire focused beam, and also should have passed the intake and exit pipes through each other for preheating/vortex recirculation/efficiency

77GSlinger (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

WELL SAID! PURE ACADEMIC MIND CONTROL GARBAGE FOR RICH KIDS! Build an implosion Turbine you rich brats and do something worthwhile for the world. This cumbersome contraption is an academic joke and produces next to nothing and is an old worn out idea, not new!Steam power is dinosaur technology, heating up stuff and blowing up stuff is all academics know how to do. Academics go insane if you mention "Cold Fusion" or free energy, they prefer slavery to energy baron supporting mit lies

mhlpn (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

I think it's a very good idea, after all we know that steam produces much more bang for the buck than other chemical reactions. Hence the reason all coal, nuclear, natural gas powered plants ultimately heat water to produce steam and then use that steam to power turbines to make electricity. Last but not least, this is more or less a science project, M.I.T.'s students put it together - there's no money to make a large one, just prove or disprove a hypothesis/best result for energy production.

m1ndcontroller (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

MIT IS FOR RETARDS!!!!!!!!!!They do nothing but spread Half-Truths on this channel!! This has to be about the CRAPPIEST SOLAR COLLECTOR I'VE EVER SEEN!!! They probably spent $10,000 on that mirror array only to put a tiny little pipe as the receiver!!!! This isn't going to revolutionize shit !!!!!!! MIT Spreading Lies Once AGAIN!!!!!MIT Spreading Lies Once AGAIN!!!!!

DominickBlack (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

I don't see why you wouldn't want a Sterling engine instead of a steam creating system??Why did you choose steam over thermal exchange?

HWGuyEG (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

Wait, what the hell did they patent?